과천외고 영어 오답: respectively의 두 집단·두 결과 짝을 바로잡는 법 실전문제

Two conservation teams, North and South, examined wooden and metal objects, respectively. During the first week, they inspected thirty and twenty objects, respectively. During the second week, North inspected ten fewer objects than in the first week, while South inspected fifty percent more. Each week's objects were new; none was counted twice. Both teams recorded surface damage, but only South tested for corrosion. Their report listed the teams in the same North–South order throughout, even when describing different materials, totals, and procedures. The report did not compare the time required for inspecting a single object, so a greater total did not necessarily indicate faster work. It could also reflect more staff or longer working hours.

Two conservation teams, North and South, examined wooden and metal objects, respectively. During the first week, they inspected thirty and twenty objects, respectively. During the second week, North inspected ten fewer objects than in the first week, while South inspected fifty percent more. Each week's objects were new; none was counted twice. Both teams recorded surface damage, but only South tested for corrosion. Their report listed the teams in the same North–South order throughout, even when describing different materials, totals, and procedures. The report did not compare the time required for inspecting a single object, so a greater total did not necessarily indicate faster work. It could also reflect more staff or longer working hours.

Two conservation teams, North and South, examined wooden and metal objects, respectively. During the first week, they inspected thirty and twenty objects, respectively. During the second week, North inspected ten fewer objects than in the first week, while South inspected fifty percent more. Each week's objects were new; none was counted twice. Both teams recorded surface damage, but only South tested for corrosion. Their report listed the teams in the same North–South order throughout, even when describing different materials, totals, and procedures. The report did not compare the time required for inspecting a single object, so a greater total did not necessarily indicate faster work. It could also reflect more staff or longer working hours.

Two conservation teams, North and South, examined wooden and metal objects, respectively. During the first week, they inspected thirty and twenty objects, respectively. During the second week, North inspected ten fewer objects than in the first week, while South inspected fifty percent more. Each week's objects were new; none was counted twice. Both teams recorded surface damage, but only South tested for corrosion. Their report listed the teams in the same North–South order throughout, even when describing different materials, totals, and procedures. The report did not compare the time required for inspecting a single object, so a greater total did not necessarily indicate faster work. It could also reflect more staff or longer working hours.

Two conservation teams, North and South, examined wooden and metal objects, respectively. During the first week, they inspected thirty and twenty objects, respectively. During the second week, North inspected ten fewer objects than in the first week, while South inspected fifty percent more. Each week's objects were new; none was counted twice. Both teams recorded surface damage, but only South tested for corrosion. Their report listed the teams in the same North–South order throughout, even when describing different materials, totals, and procedures. The report did not compare the time required for inspecting a single object, so a greater total did not necessarily indicate faster work. It could also reflect more staff or longer working hours.