과천외고 영어 끊어읽기: 낭독할 때 쉼표보다 절 경계를 먼저 보세요 실전문제

자체 제작 모의고사형 연습문제 · 학교 공식 시험지가 아닙니다.

영어 지문의 근거를 바탕으로 답을 고르세요. 5문항 · 총점 100점 · 권장 20분. 모든 답을 선택하고 제출하면 정답과 각 선지의 해설이 공개됩니다.

0 / 5 선택

난이도 중20점1. 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 어법상 틀린 것은?

The glass containers ① that held the original samples were stored separately. The label on each container ② identified the collection site. Although several labels ③ had faded, the scientist who ④ was responsible for the archive ⑤ were able to match them with entries in the notebook.

①②③④⑤

난이도 중20점2. 다음 글의 내용과 일치하는 것은?

The proposal that the architect submitted after the meeting included a second entrance. Although the owners had rejected an earlier design, they welcomed this change because it allowed deliveries to avoid the crowded front hall. The entrance, which faced the narrow lane behind the building, would be used by staff rather than visitors.

① The architect rejected the owners’ proposal after the meeting.② The owners supported a change separating deliveries from the busy front hall.③ The second entrance was designed mainly for visiting customers.④ The earlier design had already included an entrance on the rear lane.⑤ The front hall was removed because the rear lane was too narrow.

난이도 상20점3. 다음 글의 밑줄 친 부분 중, 어법상 틀린 것은?

The workers who repaired the roof ① were paid from the emergency fund. The cost of the materials, including several beams ② ordered from abroad, ③ was higher than expected. What surprised the council most ④ were the speed of the repair, because the building ⑤ had remained closed for months.

①②③④⑤

난이도 상20점4. 다음 글의 요지로 가장 적절한 것은?

Although the first report described the island as uninhabited, the diaries that the expedition brought home mentioned smoke near the eastern coast. The historian who examined those diaries did not claim that a permanent settlement had been found. Smoke might have come from temporary visitors. She argued only that the report’s description required further investigation, not that its opposite had already been proved.

① 기존 설명을 의심하게 하는 증거가 반대 설명의 확증과 같지는 않다.② 일기에 기록된 관찰은 공식 보고서보다 더 정확하다.③ 연기가 관찰된 해안에는 영구 거주지가 존재한다.④ 탐험 보고서의 오류는 탐험대가 의도적으로 만든다.⑤ 상반된 기록이 발견되면 둘 다 역사 자료에서 제외해야 한다.

난이도 상20점5. 다음 글에서 추론할 수 있는 것은?

The river, which had flooded the lower fields in spring, was unusually shallow by August. Farmers who depended on those fields asked for an additional well, while residents whose houses stood near the proposed site worried about construction noise. The council approved a survey, not the well itself. Whether the project would proceed depended on what the survey revealed about underground water.

① The council had already authorised construction when residents objected.② The spring flood guaranteed an adequate underground water supply.③ The survey’s findings would affect a decision that had not yet been made.④ The residents’ houses had been destroyed by the spring flood.⑤ The farmers rejected the survey because they opposed the additional well.