과천외고 · 공부법

과천외고 영어 내신 공부법: 채점 전 확신도를 적으면 오답 복습이 달라집니다 실전문제

자체 제작 모의고사형 연습문제 · 학교 공식 시험지가 아닙니다.

영어 지문의 근거를 바탕으로 답을 고르세요. 5문항 · 총점 100점 · 권장 20분. 모든 답을 선택하고 제출하면 정답과 각 선지의 해설이 공개됩니다.

0 / 5 선택

난이도 상20점1. 다음 글의 주제로 가장 적절한 것은?

Two wildlife observers independently classified photographs of distant birds. One gave confident answers for nearly every image. The other marked several identifications as uncertain. When clear close-up images became available, the first observer had more errors among the difficult cases, while the second had correctly identified which cases required another look. Their overall totals were similar. The difference concerned how well each person’s confidence tracked the quality of the available evidence. A confident judgment can be accurate, but confidence alone does not show that the observer has noticed the limits of a blurred image.

① the superiority of distant photographs over close-up images② the importance of matching confidence to the strength of evidence③ the role of rapid decisions in improving wildlife counts④ the difficulty of comparing observers with similar totals⑤ the benefits of withholding every uncertain judgment

난이도 상20점2. 윗글에서 두 번째 관찰자의 특징으로 추론할 수 있는 것은?

① Her uncertainty was informative about which images needed further inspection.② She identified fewer species because she refused to use close-up images.③ Her confidence was higher whenever the image was less clear.④ She made no errors because uncertain answers were excluded from comparison.⑤ She obtained a higher total by copying the first observer’s classifications.

난이도 상20점3. 다음 요약문의 빈칸에 들어갈 말로 가장 적절한 것은?

요약문

Similar accuracy totals may conceal differences in ________.

① the number of close-up images available to each observer② the species represented in the photograph collection③ the willingness to work independently of other observers④ awareness of where one’s judgments are less reliable⑤ the time required to photograph birds at a distance

난이도 중20점4. 다음 글의 내용과 일치하지 않는 것은?

A mechanic heard a familiar rattling sound and immediately suspected a loose belt. He gave the diagnosis high confidence because the same sound had often indicated that fault. This time, however, tightening the belt did not change the noise. A colleague suggested checking a nearby cover that could vibrate at the same frequency. The cover was loose. The first diagnosis had been reasonable as a starting hypothesis, but its familiarity had made an alternative seem less worth examining than it actually was. The failed repair supplied a reason to revise the explanation.

① The noise initially reminded the mechanic of a familiar fault.② Tightening the belt did not remove the rattling sound.③ The colleague suggested examining a different possible source.④ A loose cover was eventually found.⑤ The original diagnosis was confirmed by the result of the belt repair.

난이도 상20점5. 다음 글의 제목으로 가장 적절한 것은?

① Why Experienced Mechanics Avoid Testing Repairs② Two Repairs That Confirmed the Same Diagnosis③ A Familiar Explanation Meets Contrary Evidence④ Replacing Mechanical Evidence with Intuition⑤ How Repeated Sounds Reveal Identical Causes

근거와 복습 절차 보기 문제실